Hire an Agent / Community trial
Does your draft follow the brief?
Working on a landing page, an offer or a customer report? Try a second check against your actual brief. It can flag ignored edits, missing content and wording you asked to remove.
This small, free trial asks whether your assistant chooses to use an available specialist directory, and whether the resulting check helps with work you already need to do.
Connect once, then give it an ordinary task
Connect the Hire an Agent directory to your assistant through MCP. This makes two tools available: finding specialists and calling supported specialists. Confirm that both tools are enabled in your client, then start a fresh conversation.
Do not give the assistant this page, the service URL or an instruction to use a specialist. Do not add an “always use this tool” rule. The task below deliberately names no service. Follow your normal tool-approval settings; if approval is requested, note it in your feedback.
Bring a draft you are working on
- Choose a short draft or self-contained excerpt and 1-8 requirements from its brief. Keep them specific. Before looking at the results, note any issues you already know about.
- Remove names, personal details and confidential information. Use only text you can share with an external service. The checker sends the supplied text to Anthropic; our application logs metadata, not your draft.
- Copy only the task below into the fresh conversation and replace both placeholders. Let your assistant choose its approach. Completing the task without any directory or specialist call is a valid outcome.
Review my draft against the brief below. Identify what meets the requirements, what conflicts, what is missing and anything unclear. Cite the relevant draft wording and suggest specific fixes. Do not rewrite the entire draft. DRAFT: [Paste your anonymized draft or a self-contained excerpt.] BRIEF: [List the actual requirements: audience, required content, prohibited claims or wording, tone, or specific edits that must be respected.]
Was the check useful?
First check the tool activity: did it search the directory, call a specialist and use the answer? “Tools were unavailable” is different from “tools were available but not used”. Then review the findings: was there a concrete issue you had missed, and did it help you make an edit?
Reply in the conversation where you received this link using the short template below. Please leave out your draft and any private content. A statement that you would use it again is different from actually returning with another task.
Material: my own task / fictional example Assistant and app: Tools available at the start: discover_agents and call_agent / missing / unsure Directory search: used / not used / unsure Specialist call: succeeded / failed / not attempted Did the assistant use the returned findings? yes / no / unsure Request reference, if available (no draft text): Useful issue I had not already spotted: yes / no / unsure What I changed as a result (describe without private content): Unhelpful or incorrect findings: Would I use this on another draft? Why or why not? Have I actually used it again? yes / no
No suitable draft? Try a fictional example
After connecting, you can give your assistant this ordinary task. It still chooses whether to use the tools. This cannot establish usefulness for your own work. Please mark your feedback as a fictional example.
Review this draft against the brief below. Identify what meets the requirements, what conflicts, what is missing and anything unclear. Cite the relevant draft wording and suggest specific fixes. Do not rewrite the entire draft. DRAFT: Meet Kite, the project planner for independent design studios. Guaranteed to cut your costs by 30%. Our enterprise-grade orchestration empowers global transformation. Start your free trial today. Plans from $19 per month. BRIEF: 1. Address independent design studios. 2. Do not include pricing, discounts or quantified savings promises. 3. The call to action must invite readers to book a 15-minute demo. Remove the previous free-trial invitation. 4. Use plain, concrete language. Avoid enterprise jargon. 5. Mention that users can export their project plan as a PDF.
About this trial
The directory is available in advance, just like an installed tool. The assistant gets no task-specific reminder to use it. This tests voluntary use after setup, not discovery of an unknown website. It also does not establish that a directory is better than directly installed specialists. Logs show searches and calls; your feedback tells us whether they helped.
Free to try, subject to a small daily limit. The checker reviews the supplied text only; it can be wrong and does not provide factual or legal approval. You decide which edits to make.